Scottish Parliament e-Brief
Issue 222,
|
|
|
Ministerial Statement: Smoking |
|
Executive Debate: Smoking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Debate: Fostering |
|
First Minister |
|
Question Time *
Education
and Young People & Tourism, Culture and Sport; *
Finance
and Public Services & Communities; *
General
Questions |
|
Procedures Committee Debate: A New Procedure for
Members’ Bills |
|
Procedures Committee Debate: Timescales and Stages of Bills |
|
Member’s Business: Dying with Dignity (Jeremy Purvis (LD)) |
IN COMMITTEE
This week’s likely highlights in the Committee
Corridors include:
|
||
AM |
Finance |
Evidence on the Spending Review
2004, the Draft Budget and EYF comes from Finance
and Public Sector Reform Minister, Tom McCabe and officials. Civil servants also give evidence on the
Financial Memorandum of the Gaelic Language ( |
|
|
The Committee looks at Private
Bills. |
|
This week sees further consideration of the replacement for the Members’
Interests Order. |
|
|
The AGS briefs members on his
report entitled “Maintaining Scotland’s roads.” |
|
|
|
3 panels of witnesses give
evidence on the Further and Higher Education ( |
|
More evidence for the Promoting
Scotland worldwide inquiry is followed by a paper on the remit and functions
of the EU Fisheries Control Agency from Alasdair Morrison. |
|
|
The Workforce Planning Inquiry
continues apace. This week, another
three panels of witnesses give evidence.
Contributors include representatives from various |
|
|
||
|
|
A host of witnesses, including the
Minister, give evidence on the Budget. |
Public Petitions |
Topics covered by new petitions
include a junction on the A90, the Scottish Football Team’s management
regime, treason and golden eagles. Members also return to the petition on the
safety of the spreading of sewage sludge. |
|
Education |
The Minister and officials give
evidence on the Budget and the curriculum review. |
|
Justice 1 |
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons and
his deputy give evidence on the former’s report on Prisons for 2003-2004. |
SECTION 2 – NEWS
Shaping
the future of the NHS
The independent expert group looking at the
future of NHS Scotland is holding a series of regional meetings with patients
and medical professionals round the country in December.
The Kerr Group, chaired by cancer
specialist Professor David Kerr, will be taking views to help them draw up a
national framework to guide future decisions on how the NHS is run. This follows his visit to Inverclyde in
October.
The public meetings (all
Glasgow
Royal Concert Hall, December 1
Inverness
Drumossie Hotel, December 2
Edinburgh
Usher Hall, December 6
Dundee Caird Hall, December 13
Aberdeen
Exhibition and Conference Centre, December 15
Because of space limitations, places
at each venue will be provided on a first-come-first served basis.
Those wishing to attend one of these
meetings should write to: Freepost Plus, RLRS-EHHE-JTXC,
Room GE16, St. Andrew's House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 DIG, or email: nhsfuturedebate@scotland.gsi.gov.uk
Comments by post or email are also
welcome.
In addition to the public meetings,
the Group have also produced a leaflet seeking views, which will be distributed
throughout the NHS for staff and patients.
Fund
aimed at reducing retail packaging
The
Scottish Executive is provide £764,000 through the Retail Innovation Fund as an
incentive for retailers to lead by example and reduce packaging waste. The move is part of an £8 million
An
estimated 12 million tonnes of household waste is produced annually from
supermarket and fast food packaging in the
WRAP
promotes recycling and resource efficiency across the
Businesses
with a turnover of £2 million or more and who use over 50 tonnes of packaging
per year are required, under packaging legislation, to recycle and or recover
some of their waste. Packaging recovery targets are currently 50%, rising to
70% from
The
Executive has pledged to recycle or compost 25% of municipal waste by 2006 and
30% by 2008.
SECTION 3 - NOTES ON THIS WEEK’S CHAMBER
BUSINESS
This is on the controversial topic of banning smoking in certain public places. At the time of writing, however, the details (such as what type of premises would have extra restrictions placed upon it) have not been confirmed.
This is followed by an Executive debate on this statement.
The day concludes with a Member’s Business debate on the Science
and the Parliament Event,
THURSDAY
begins with an Executive
debate on Fostering.
Last September, a discussion paper was published which was designed to enable families and professionals to contribute their views on the future of adoption and fostering legislation.
The paper, Choices for Children in Fostering and Adoption, identifies key questions for the Adoption Policy Review Group to examine. This group's remit is to recommend changes in the law of adoption and fostering and current practice in order that the system be brought up to date and, where appropriate, simplified so that the best outcome is provided for children who, for whatever reason, require to be brought up by persons other than their natural parents.
It is expected the group will take around 18 months to carry out its work before making recommendations to Ministers.
This is followed by First Minister’s Question Time.
In the afternoon, after Question Time (for the departments featured in the themed section this week, see Section 1 above), there is the eagerly anticipated main event – a Procedures Committee debate on A New Procedure for Members’ Bills.
This follows the publication by the Committee of a report into the matter. In the interests of encouraging Bills with cross party support, the report recommends that MSPs who want to introduce a Member’s Bill will have to secure eighteen supporters from across the political divide. At present MSPs need only the backing of 11 fellow Members to see a Bill proposal clear the first hurdle in the parliamentary process. The Committee is also calling for a minimum period of 12 weeks consultation to be carried out on new Bills proposed by MSPs.
This is followed by another Procedures Committee debate on the equally gripping topic of Timescales and Stages of Bills.
Again, this follows a, to put it mildly, fairly dry and technical report published by the Committee which sets out a package of proposed changes to Standing Orders aimed at providing more time for scrutiny throughout the 3-stage process for considering Bills.
Among other things, the report calls for:
More time for Stage 1 inquiries, including at least six to eight weeks for the submission of written evidence on any substantial Bill.
An extra week between Stage 1 and Stage 2 to allow for the preparation of amendments.
The increasing by a day the notice-period for lodging amendments – from 2 days to 3 at Stage 2 and from 3 days to 4 at Stage 3 – primarily to enable members (and outside observers) to see further in advance how the amendments are to be grouped for debate.
Chamber business concludes with a Member’s Business debate on Dying with Dignity from Jeremy Purvis (LD).
[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]
[ Copyright ] [ Directgov ] [ Scottish Parliament ]