Scottish Parliament Committee News
Issue
189, 16th May 2006
Audit
Committee
The Committee travelled to Inverness
last week to take evidence on the Section 22 reports on Inverness College.
It heard from the Chair of the Board of Management, the Director of Finance
& Commercialisation and the Chair of The Finance and General Purposes
Committee. The Committee agreed to take evidence from the Accountable
Officer of the Enterprise, Transport and Lifelong Learning Department at a
future meeting. It also agreed to write to the Scottish Funding Council and
Inverness College seeking clarification on a number of issues raised
during discussion. It was recognised that, while Inverness College has
financial difficulties, it is by no means a failing college and the Funding
Council has compiled a report which should help the college get its finances
back on track.
Communities
Committee
Last week's meeting took evidence on homelessness
from various organisations with an interest in the field. This session
was an opportunity for the Committee to hear about the progress of the
homelessness working groups and gather evidence on issues which may be of
concern. The evidence gathered will be relayed to the Communities
Minister, Malcolm Chisholm, when he appears before the Committee on 24th May.
Education
Committee
The Committee took evidence on the
draft Joint Inspections (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2006,
hearing from the Deputy Education Minister and officials. The regulations
were approved by the Committee.
It also began evidence sessions on the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Bill, hearing from organisations including the British Association for Adoption and Fostering Scotland, Children in Scotland, Children 1st, Barnardo's Scotland and the Scottish Adoption Advisory Service. The main issues raised were: permanency orders, withdrawal of rights of birth parents, adoption by unmarried couples, fostering and adoption allowances and kinship care.
Enterprise
& Culture Committee
The Committee heard from the Executive
on the Tourist
Boards (Scotland) Bill. The Bill is mainly a technical measure
related to the changes to the organisation of tourism and the name change for
Visit Scotland following last year's reorganisation.
There was also a lively debate about Michael Matheson's (SNP) proposals for a national debate on a national anthem for Scotland. Unfortunately, the proceedings degenerated into petty politics and Mr Matheson's idea to spark a national debate was rejected by the Committee.
Members also considered a draft of the Stage 1 report on the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Bill.
Environment
and Rural Development Committee
Members met in Oban to continue taking
evidence on the Crofting
Reform etc Bill.
Four panels of witnesses included crofting organisations and land managers, such
as the Scottish Crofting Foundation, the Isle of Gigha Heritage Trust, the
National Trust for Scotland, Scottish Natural Heritage, Argyll and Bute Council
and the Scottish Renewables Forum. In the main, the witnesses welcomed the
new opportunities to set up crofts under the Bill, but concerns remain regarding
the long-term viability of crofting and the performance of the Crofters'
Commission. Again, affordable housing was raised as an issue for crofting
communities.
This week, the Committee will meet in Inverness, where it will take its final set of evidence from local crofters - this time representing the Highlands and Shetland Isles - as well as the Ministers.
Equal
Opportunities Committee
The disability inquiry continued
with evidence from Transport Minister, Tavish Scott and various disability
transport groups (UPDATE, DisabledGo, Scottish Accessible Information Forum) on
transport issues. Issues raised concerned access to appropriate transport
to ensure disabled people have the same opportunities to access employment and
leisure.
The next issue for the Committee for the inquiry is architecture, dealing specifically with new-builds where barriers remain for disabled people (for example, accessing locked disabled toilets).
European
and External Relations Committee
As part of its work programme 2006, the
Committee discussed a briefing paper on energy issues. It discussed
the extent of evidence which can be taken in relation to a large part of the
energy Green Paper which is reserved to Westminster. The Committee decided
it would look at energy conservation.
Members also discussed a letter written to the convenor from Scottish Public Pension’s Agency regarding local government pensions. The discussion centred on the removal of the "rule of 85" and Ministers' stance on the legal requirement to remain compliant with the EC Directive.
The Committee took evidence from Jeremy Wyatt, Managing Director of Hall Aitken (authors of "Making Every Euro Count", a report on EU Structural Funds administration options for Scotland), on the UK Government’s National Strategic Reference Framework (which poses a series of specific questions about how the UK Government plan to manage Structural Funds for 2007-2013) and "An Inquiry into the Scottish Executive’s plans for future structural funds programmes 2007-13". The Committee is seeking written evidence on how best to spend the funds, which were worth over one billion pounds to Scotland in 2000 – 2006. Due to the enlargement of the European Union from 15 to 25 member states, however, the money available for Scotland could be cut by as much as 55% in 2007 – 2013. Mr Wyatt gave his view on comparisons which had been made between how other EU countries administered their structural funds and stated that the level of uncertainty surrounding the future management and levels of funding for Scotland is having a negative impact on the people involved in this on a day-to-day basis.
Finance
Committee
For its inquiry into the Financial
Memorandum for the Adoption
and Children (Scotland) Bill, the
Committee had previously agreed to undertake level 2 scrutiny and issued its
standard questionnaire to potentially affected organisations. Members last
week discussed the written submissions from the Scottish Legal Aid Board;
Fostering Network; and British Association for Adoption and Fostering. The
Committee also took oral evidence from Scottish Executive officials. The
officials agreed to write to the Committee clarifying a number of issues and
providing updated figures in relation to the Financial Memorandum.
The Committee agreed to adopt level 3 scrutiny when considering the Financial Memorandum for the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Bill - i.e. that it should take oral evidence from affected organisations followed by Scottish Executive officials and also seek written evidence from relevant organisations.
The meeting also agreed: the contents of the Committee's annual report; its report on the Financial Memorandum for the Criminal Proceedings etc. (Reform) (Scotland) Bill and its report on the Financial Memorandum for the Tourist Boards (Scotland) Bill, subject to specified changes being made.
Glasgow
Airport Rail Link Bill Committee
The Committee heard from
Infratil Airports Ltd., Scottish Airports Ltd., Passenger Focus Group Scotland.,
the Confederation of Passenger Transport UK and Strathclyde Partnership for
Transport on the general principles of the Bill.
Passenger Focus Group Scotland noted the benefits of the rail link, including developing the capacity and capability of the existing network and enhancing the public transport services to the airport. However, the group wants to see a commitment to the principles of through-ticketing and passenger representation. Having initially opposed the rail link, the Confederation of Passenger Transport UK is now in support and gave written evidence, stressing the need to involve bus and coach operators to ensure multimodal integration.
The Committee also received a response from the Bill's promoter on the detailed questions put by the Committee. These included explanations of how the whole region around the airport will benefit - highlighting tourism, jobs, and gross added value for Glasgow, Renfrewshire, Ayrshire and Inverclyde. The promoter also gave evidence on the economic benefits of similar rail links to other UK European airports.
Health
Committee
The Committee last week considered
its approach to the Health
Board Elections (Scotland) Bill, considering a timetable for the Bill
and from whom it would seek to take evidence. The Committee also took its
first look at the care inquiry report and decided to finalise it at a
future meeting, after this week's evidence session on direct payments.
Justice
1 Committee
A
roundtable discussion on the Criminal
Proceedings etc. (Reform) (Scotland) Bill
featured representatives of the Scottish courts system. The discussion
centred on proposed changes to the role of JPs and District Courts. Some
of the concerns raised included the re-appointment and training of JPs and the
proposals for a Procurator Fiscal fines system.
Justice
2 Committee
More on the Legal
Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill
last week, with evidence from 3
panels of witnesses which included Citizens Advice Scotland; academics; and
Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers.
The Committee then considered its draft annual report for the Parliamentary year from 7 May 2005 to 6 May 2006.
Local
Government and Transport Committee
The Committee continued its freight
transport inquiry, with evidence from Transport Minister, Tavish
Scott; Scottish Enterprise; the Society of Chief Officers of Transportation in
Scotland; and Transport Scotland. The evidence sessions are now complete
and the Committee will begin drafting its report.
Also, Fergus Ewing (SNP) was elected as Deputy Convener and Andrew Arbuckle (LD) has resigned to be replaced by Mike Rumbles (LD).
Subordinate
Legislation Committee
The Committee considered issues
surrounding the Criminal
Proceedings etc. (Reform) (Scotland) Bill.
The Bill contains a number of provisions aimed at improving the operation of the
summary justice (i.e. courts without a jury) system. It also brings
forward reform of the operation of the bail and remand system in Scotland.
The Bill makes provision in 8 main areas. (1) reform to the system of bail and
remand; (2) changes in the law relating to criminal proceedings relating mainly
to procedure in summary cases; (3) increases in the criminal sentencing powers
to summary courts; (4) extending the range of alternatives to prosecution which
can be offered to an alleged offender; (5) reform of the way in which fines and
other financial penalties imposed can be collected and enforced; (6) the
establishment of Justice of the Peace courts in place of District Courts; (7)
reform of the procedures by which justices of the peace (JPs) are appointed and
trained; and (8) placing the existing Inspectorate of Prosecution in
Scotland on a statutory footing.
Other
Committee Homepages:
Edinburgh Airport Rail Link Bill Committee
Procedures Committee
Public Petitions Committee
Standards Committee
[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]
[ Copyright ] [ Directgov ] [ Scottish Parliament ]