Scottish Parliament Committee News
Issue 147, 22nd December 2004

 

Audit Committee
A quick meeting last week saw the Committee consider the arrangements for its inquiry into the report by the Auditor General for Scotland entitled “The 2003/04 Audit of Argyll and Clyde Health Board.”

 

Communities Committee
The Committee continued its evidence taking on the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Bill. Last week’s evidence came from two panels, the first comprising members of the legal profession including Simon Mackintosh of the Charity Law Association; Stephen Phillips of the Law Society of Scotland; and Dr Patrick Ford, a lecturer in Law at the University of Dundee.  The second panel consisted of representatives from the Charity community including, among others, Martin Sime, Chief Executive of SCVO; and Norrie Murray, Head of Policy and Strategy Unit Volunteer Development Scotland.  Whilst the evidence given by both panels was uncontroversial, it was noted that they did take opposing views. The legal panel expressed concern over the independence of the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) and what might be seen as the overregulation of English Charities operating in Scotland, a view the charity panel did not share. The Committee also considered the Building Standards Advisory Committee (Scotland) Regulations 2004.

 

Education Committee
Evidence on the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Bill continued.

Evidence this week came from the Bord na Gaidhlig, who are (unsurprisingly) in favour of the Bill.  It praised the goodwill shown by the Executive in the process of drafting and amending the legislation and noted its satisfaction with the overall framework of the Bill.  On the specific issue of the status of Gaelic, the Bord noted the symbolic importance this has with the Gaelic community, but warned against terminology such as “official language” or “equal status”, citing this as inappropriate and confusing.  Instead, the Bord would rather use the term “equal validity”.

The Bord is also hopeful that the Bill as presently constituted creates a workable way of addressing the various issues which currently confront Gaelic medium education and the teaching of Gaelic as a subject.

Members also discussed their forward work programme.  The Committee will be looking at the issues of pupil motivation, early years and school transport policy in the New Year.

 

Enterprise & Culture Committee
A busy meeting took evidence on the Transport (Scotland) Bill; the consideration of response from the Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning in response to the Committee’s scrutiny of the Scottish Executive’s 2005/06 budget proposals; the consideration of an updated work programme for 2005; the review of the progress to date on its scrutiny of the Area Tourist Board review; and the consideration of a revised Stage 1 draft report on the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Bill, which will be published next week.

On Transport, the main areas of concern from the groups giving evidence was the issue of the power given to local authorities in the Bill to make utility companies resurface an entire road when they dig up only part of it as part of their work.  There was also a concern raised in relation to the penalties which can be imposed due to congestion resulting arising from roadworks.

On the budget, the Committee sought clarification from Scottish Enterprise on elements of its spending.

 

Environment and Rural Development Committee
The Committee concluded its stage 2 consideration of the Water Services etc. (Scotland) Bill, with Labour members successful in securing action to tackle the smells from sewerage works.  The Committee also asked the Deputy Minister Environment Minister, Lewis Macdonald, some details questions to clarify the investment programme, enforcement issues and how the statutory code on odour nuisance would be progressed.

 

Equal Opportunities Committee
The Committee continued taking evidence on the Prevention of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Bill, hearing from representatives of the Somali Women Action Group, the Muslim Women’s Resource Centre and the Foundation for Women’s Health, Research and Development.

 

Finance Committee
The Finance Committee took evidence for its Cross Cutting Expenditure Review on Economic Development from Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform, Tom McCabe; Minister for
Enterprise and Lifelong Learning, Jim Wallace; Minister for Transport, Nicol Stephen; Minister for Communities, Malcolm Chisholm; and Scottish Executive officials.

Particular concerns were raised about the “deliverability” of some aspects of the transport capital programme such as the Edinburgh and Glasgow airport links and Waverley station refurbishment. Nicol Stephen admitted "deliverability is the biggest challenge for transport in Scotland, and it is my biggest responsibility as the Minister for Transport. To be frank, we do not currently have the capability or the resource to ensure delivery, which is why we are establishing an [national transport] agency and why we accept that we must recruit new people with engineering and project management skills." (Col 2120)

Scottish Executive officials also provided evidence for the Committee’s inquiry into the Financial Memorandum for the Transport (Scotland) Bill.

The Committee then finalised its consideration of its Report on Stage 2 of the 2005-06 Budget Process. The Parliament will debate the report on 23rd December. The Committee welcomed the Executive’s implementation of several previous recommendations including cutting the number of process-based targets, streamlining the budget process and increasing spending on areas which support economic growth, such as lifelong learning and transport. Nonetheless, some areas for improvement were identified - the key recommendations of the report include:

·         There is a need for some form of strategic target related to economic growth, using comparative growth and growth indicators as benchmarks for improvement;

·         The Executive should have been clearer in the presentation of its efficiency savings; and

·         The Executive should examine the impact of low increases in grant support year by year for local government, especially towards the end of the Spending Review period.

 

Health Committee
Most of the agenda items were held in private, with the Committee discussing possible witnesses for its eating disorder inquiry.  The Committee also considered a draft of its workforce planning inquiry report, as well as looking at a number of petitions and some subordinate legislation.

 

Justice 1 Committee
The Committee continued its evidence taking for the inquiry into the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes in prisons. The Committee looked at the first draft of its first report and went on to take evidence from Hugh Henry, Deputy Minister for Justice, as well as a number of representatives from criminal justice services around Scotland.  On the issue of work for prisoners, the question was asked “does work in prisons contribute toward the rehabilitation of prisoners?”.  It was felt that as each prisoner was different they would take differing experiences from this particular part of the programme.  A number of written responses to the inquiry commented on the difficulties of replicating best practice across the system.  Effective programmes might not transfer easily due to resources and different systems of inter-agency working.  Some responses also indicated that when a prisoner fails to complete a programme, it is often the case that they perform worse afterwards, even compared to prisoners who never participated in the programme.  The Committee’s evidence taking is ongoing and its second draft of the first report will come back to a future meeting.

 

Justice 2 Committee
The Committee took evidence from Colin Boyd, the Lord Advocate, on the UK Supreme Court legislation. The Committee had some concerns about this Westminster legislation and the affect a Supreme Court might have on Scots Law. The Committee were keen to see the integrity of Scots Law maintained and after some discussion it was generally felt that integrity would be preserved.  It is hoped that the Committee report on the Supreme Court will be ready early in the New Year.

The Committee went on to discuss its paper on Youth Justice, hearing from members of the Committee who had visited various projects around Scotland involved in youth justice. The Committee is expected to continue its evidence taking into next year.

 

Local Government and Transport Committee
A marathon session saw the Committee question a number of witness panels with regard to Stage 1 of the Transport (Scotland) Bill and question Deputy Minister for Finance and Public Services, Tavish Scott, on the UK Government’s Gambling Bill.  The Gambling Bill received the majority of the media coverage, with the Committee voting by five votes to three to recommend that a Sewel motion be used.  The vote saw the SNP reject more powers over gambling be devolved to
Scotland and vote to keep power with London Ministers.   Stage 1 of the Transport Bill proved much less controversial.  Representatives from the utility companies spoke on the proposed independent roadworks watchdog and stressed the need to ensure Scotland remained competitive.  There were also calls from disability campaigners to ensure that Scotland’s public transport is fully accessible.

 

Standards Committee
The main item on the agenda was the Committee’s draft report on replacing the Members’ Interests Order, which the Committee signed off.  This is expected to come before Parliament in the New Year and will see a requirement to declare non-peculiarly interests.  As well as this, it will require MSPs to declare property owned by their spouse and will remove the requirement to declare gifts to partners.  These changes will come in to force following the 2007 election.

 

Subordinate Legislation Committee
The Committee continued its deliberations on the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Bill at Stage 1. The first item was the report back from the Executive which the Committee had expected to receive at its previous meeting. On the matter of fundable further and higher education, the Committee felt that the powers were wide and should be subject to affirmative procedure.  The Executive agreed.

The Committee then handed its findings directly to the lead Committee for its meeting.  There were no other controversial matters raised at the Committee, which included issues from the Race Relations Act to protection of children.

 

Other Committee Homepages:

European and External Relations Committee
Procedures Committee
Public Petitions Committee

 

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ Directgov ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page