Scottish Parliament Committee News
Issue 146, 14th December 2004

 

Audit Committee
The main issue causing concern at the Committee meeting last week was the lack of data available from NHS Scotland to monitor progress.  There was general cross party support for the view that this lack of information was unacceptable and that it should not be allowed to continue any longer.

 

Communities Committee
The Committee continued its deliberations on the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Bill, taking evidence from the Executive Bill Team. The officials outlined the changes made following extensive consultation with charity providers and the Committee was pleased that concerns which had been raised around Charity Stewards had been addressed (they will now be replaced by Charity Trustees). Also welcomed by the Committee was the fact that there would be aid relief for Sports Clubs.

 

Education Committee
The Committee heard further evidence on the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Bill.  This week’s evidence came from the Welsh Language Board who strongly support the Bill and claim that in many ways it is stronger than the equivalent Bill in Wales.  This is due to the fact that the Bill alludes to the official status of Gaelic; specifies Gaelic culture and Gaelic education; and extends to the understanding of Gaelic.  On the Bord na Gaidhlig, the Welsh Language Board see no reason why its effects and influence cannot prove as far reaching as their own and they have stressed their willingness to assist the Bord and the Executive in the development of the Bill’s aims.

 

Enterprise & Culture Committee
Evidence on the Area Tourist Board Review continued, with a contribution from VisitScotland.  From its perspective, VisitScotland has been inclusive in its dealings with its stakeholders and has been working to ensure two way communication in the process of creating the new tourism network.  However, follow-up evidence submitted by the Scottish Area Tourist Board network disputes this claim, asserting that communication is not as VisitScotland would have us believe and claiming that the process is more of a “takeover and not a merger”.

The remainder of the meeting concentrated on the consideration of draft reports on the Arts in the Community Inquiry and the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Bill.

 

Environment and Rural Development Committee
The Committee dealt with Stage 2 of the Water Services etc. (Scotland) Bill, passing the amendments proposed by the Deputy Environment Minister.  It also heard from the Environment Minister on the December 2004 Agriculture and Fisheries Council of the EU.  The Minister noted and refuted the recent Royal Commission report.  Alistair Morrison (LAB) criticised the rhetoric of the SNP on fishing, claiming that it serves to work against, rather than in favour of, the Scottish fishing industry.  The Alex Johnston (CON) restated his party’s position on withdrawing from the CFP, while the SNP complained about the process of renegotiation every December.

 

European and External Relations Committee
The Committee is now nearing the end of its Promoting Scotland Worldwide Inquiry into the external relations policy, strategy and activities of the Scottish Executive and last week took evidence from a number of Scottish politicians. The first session heard from the Rt Hon Robin Cook MP and Professor Sir Neil McCormick. There was some interest in the views expressed by Robin Cook who told the Committee that, when he was leader of the House of Commons, he had proposed that selected MSPs should be allowed to sit in the new second chamber (following reform of the House of Lords). He told the Committee that his plan was for a portion of people to be from the devolved bodies to get a more democratic second chamber. However, his idea was fiercely opposed by his Westminster colleagues because they felt that devolution only covered a small part of Britain and would not have been fully representative. He added that there was also little enthusiasm from the Scottish Parliament or the Executive.  The Committee also heard from the Deputy First Minister, Jim Wallace; Julia Armour of Scottish Development International; Ann McVie of the Scottish Executive; and Finance and Public Sector Reform Minister, Tom McCabe. The Committee report on this issue is expected to be published early in the New Year.

The Committee then went on to discuss the involvement of the Scottish Executive in activities during the UK Government's Presidency of the European Union (July to December 2005).

 

Finance Committee
As part of its Cross Cutting Review on Economic Development, the Committee took evidence from the Scotsman’s George Kerevan and the Herald’s Alf Young, along with representatives of the Federation of Small Businesses Scotland and Lloyds TSB.

The Committee also took evidence on the Scottish Executive’s efficient government plan “Building a Better Scotland - Efficient Government Securing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Productivity” from Tom McCabe, Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform, and his officials. The Minister discussed the £745 million in recurring cash savings and £300 million of recurring time-releasing savings which have been identified for the period up to 2007-08. Much of the questioning centred around whether Scotland will be saving more or less than proposed savings in England and Wales; and the robustness of the Executive’s figures.

The Committee considered a draft report for its inquiry into the Budget Process 2005-06 and will consider it again at the next meeting.

The Committee agreed its report on the Financial Memorandum on the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Bill.  The report recommends a range of options should be considered which might help to put in place the financial controls which the Committee believes are essential for prudent financial management.

 

Health Committee
Most of the meeting was held in private, as the Committee was looking at the draft report on the major workforce planning inquiry, which is due to be published in the New Year.  The Committee did, however, briefly question SSP leader for the week Colin Fox on the consultation of his proposed Abolition of Prescription Charges Bill, agreeing that his consultation was sufficient.

 

Justice 1 Committee
The Committee took Stage 1 evidence on the Protection of Children and Prevention of Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill. Evidence came from Hugh Dignon and Kirsten Davidson of the Bill Team; Paul Johnston, a Senior Legal Officer of the Solicitor to the Scottish Executive; and Lindsey Anderson, Principle Procurator Fiscal Depute. Nothing controversial was mentioned or discussed in the formal part of the meeting

 

Local Government and Transport Committee
A full agenda included further evidence on the Transport (Scotland) Bill, with members questioning Edinburgh Council Transport Spokesperson, Cllr Andrew Burns and a number of other CoSLA representatives.  There was further discussion on the scope of the Bill and the boundaries for the new regional transport partnerships.

 

Procedures Committee
The Committee took further evidence for its Private Bills inquiry, questioning witnesses involved in the Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine Rail Bill.  The Committee also discussed in private its review of oral questions.  With no consensus emerging on the issue of timing for oral questions and FMQs, any decision was deferred until the next meeting.

 

Public Petitions Committee
A number of health petitions came before the Committee this week, including ones on the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital, organ retention and the prescription of methadone.  Following an in-depth reply from the Executive, the Committee also voted 5-4 to close a petition on Gulf War Syndrome.

 

Subordinate Legislation Committee
The Committee continued its scrutiny of the delegated powers in the two
Edinburgh tram Bills. Following concerns raised at the last meeting, it is now reported that the Promoter has accepted the Committee’s concerns and it was further agreed that any penalty fees would be 25 times the maximum single adult cash fare.

There was some concern raised by the Committee that the Executive had not responded to its request for replies to a number of questions it had raised surrounding the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Bill. This will mean that the Committee will need to discuss them at its next meeting, immediately after which it will make its report available to the lead Committee.

Other issues discussed by the Committee included the Building Standards Advisory Committee (Scotland) Regulations. The Committee is to ask the Executive who will determine the period of office for members of the Advisory Committee.

 

Other Committee Homepages:

Equal Opportunities Committee
Justice 2 Committee
Standards Committee

  

[ HOME ] [ News ] [ Report to the People ] [ Interact ] [ Links ] [ E-Mail ]

[ Copyright ] [ Directgov ] [ Scottish Parliament ]

Previous Page